LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: article: wrong baby
From:
Sarah Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Apr 1996 06:34:01 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<v01520d05ad84eff8178c@[129.123.247.32]>
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (9 lines) 
I guess the baby wasn't quite as "newborn" as the article implies. It
sounds like both parents were sound asleep when the baby was born.  I had
hospital births and I cannot imagine not recognizing my own baby- even if
there was a separation of a few hours while mother was in the recovery room.

Sarah Friend Barnett, LLLL, IBCLC
Bronx (New York City), New York
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2