Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 21 Jun 1966 21:20:07 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 08:05:46 -0400
> From: Kathleen Bruce <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: POLITICS-READ
>
> I am now asking that the Rush Limbaugh discussion be dropped. It has
> disintegrated to the point that flames are occuring on Lactnet. I have never
> in my life or history with Lactnet had to warn a subscriber that she was
> going to be barred from Lactnet if she proceeded with her notes as they
> stood until TODAY.
>
> It is sad.
>
> I am getting pissed . Let's quit, ok?
>
> (***and for those people new to LACTNET who have NOT read their LACTNET
> RULES OF THE ROAD, you had BETTER READ THEM.)
>
> Kathleen
>
Dear Lactnet subscribers,
After the above post, I received the following e-mail. Is this written
by someone who wants the Limbaugh subject dropped?
>Kathleen Bruce wrote:
>Since you feel "The Lactation field is crowded", have you considered a
>career change...perhaps working for the Clinton reelection campaign? >I think that attitudes like yours could do a lot to further the
>Democratic/liberal cause...Cheers..and, oh, unsubscribe yourself. No >time...
Actually, what I wrote was:
"The Lactation field is crowded with narrow-minded people who march in
lockstep to a Liberal agenda."
Just like a LIBERAL to to lop off 60 percent of a sentence, thereby
entirely changing its meaning. Looks like you're the one who could make
big money working for the pres and her husband. Seriously though, had I
known of your comprehension difficulties, I would have stayed with a
simpler theme.
Actually, judging from the overwhelming amount of positive mail I
received after standing up for RUSH, I'm ready to reconsider my opinion
that the feild is mostly Liberal.
Laurie
|
|
|