BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:18:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
A previous article by the lead author reports that:

Varroa destructor is not a big problem in Brazil, particularly in tropical regions. Moretto et al. (1991) suggested that climate type (warm temperatures and no winters) and hybridization (behavioral defense against Varroa ) have a positive effect on mite reduction and mean infestation rates were 5%. ....  we concluded that there was no evidence that Varroa destructor infestation had increased nationwide.

The highest rate of average colony loss in Brazil was in the South region (67.6%), followed by the Southeast region (63.5%). Of 322 validated reports, 81.2% reported pesticides as the suspected cause of bee losses ... 2.9% failures in management, 2.6% Varroa destructor, 2.3% municipal services combating mosquitos transmitting dengue (fogging), and 11% unable to specify a cause.

Castilhos, D., Bergamo, G. C., Gramacho, K. P., & Gonçalves, L. S. (2019). Bee colony losses in Brazil: a 5-year online survey. Apidologie, 50, 263-272.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2