BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Randy Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Nov 2023 19:01:04 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
> A possible explanation for this finding is that adaptation of mites to
host cues occurs in these experiments.
This apparently occurred when varroa adapted to using Apis mellifera as a
host.
Now some bee stocks are adapting back.
And we can expect the mite to adapt in return -- the Red Queen hypothesis.

I felt that it was a mistake for the Baton Rouge lab to abandon SMR when
Spivak and Ibraham published their paper on VSH.
SMR would be the first thing that I'd expect evolution to select for.
I'm glad to see that it's back in the forefront.
There are any number of ways that the brood and workers can suppress varroa
reproductive success.

Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
530 277 4450
ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2