Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 14 Jul 2022 19:45:41 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> “We know that science can produce delicious and nutritious honey, which is molecularly identical to traditional honey, at no cost to our precious bees. At MeliBio, we are here to introduce certainty in the supply chain and help companies simplify their honey sourcing, while making their honey-based formulations sustainable and delicious. Together with our clients, we can make the future of honey better, for both humans and for bees.”
>
I am concerned that such *honey* has been dominating the world market for at least 15 years.
In the EU, I think it has been traded and imported a lot for at least 15 years.
It is generally known publicly that when negotiating contracts in large trade, terms like honey and non-honey are used, because the price and any other paper-documentary measures for the correctness of the sale depend on it.
It is interesting that it does not have a problem from a microbiological point of view, but from a taste point of view it is a typical smell and taste.
I would be interested in how, for example, the continent of Australia reacts to such a honey invasion. That is, if the end customer knows that he is buying a synthetic but completely pure product that does not carry any pathogens. In the reality TV show on the borders of Australia, there is a big argument that honey must not be imported, there is a risk of large financial penalties. So it seems logical to me that synthetic honey has absolutely no problem traveling to any continent when it is so pure and processed by cooking sugar.
Gustav Palan
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|