Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 19 Nov 2017 05:38:39 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The question is asked whether donor breast milk meets the caloric needs of
babies three days of age or younger.
The answer is YES. I answer assuming that the human milk being discussed
comes from a non-profit human donor milk bank, like those accredited by
HMBANA (see my signature line), that use Holder pasteurization. Indeed,
donor human milk is a critical element in the care of *pre-term* babies in
NICUs. Processed milk is even sometimes labelled to denote its caloric
content.
Here is an open-access article that reviews the impact of Holder
pasteurization on human milk. "Overall, current evidence does not support
the hypothesis of a relevant change in energy intake by feeding the infant
with pasteurized rather than raw [donor milk]."
There is a loss of some of the other elements of the milk, but -- again --
they still want it in NICUs, so we know that human milk is waaaaaaaay
better than
cow's-milk- or soy-based formulas that have none of the anti-infective
properties of human milk.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4997390/
To see how human milk is screened, processed, and distributed at a HMBANA
bank, look here: https://www.hmbana.org/milk-processing
--
Liz Brooks, JD, IBCLC, FILCA
Wyndmoor, PA, USA
Director, Human Milk Banking Assn of North America (2015-17)
Adjunct Professor, Drexel Univ, Public Policy of Breastfeeding
"IBCLCs empower women and save babies' lives!"-Ursuline Singleton
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|