Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:30:08 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>At least for the initiation category, my understanding is that it
>reflects even just one feed at the breast, or attempted feed.
Yes - no problem with that! That's the accepted definition of initiation.
It's the exclusive bf that I was wondering about.
Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor, UK
>
>Sent from my phone
>
>
>> On Oct 22, 2014, at 8:50 AM, heather <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> A colleague has sent this:
>>
>> http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2014breastfeedingreportcard.pdf
>>
>> How robust is the collection of the data?
>>
>> I ask, because the exclusive breastfeeding figures seem very high indeed.
>>
>> We know US mothers have much shorter maternity leave than we do in
>>Europe, and would find it hard to maintain excl breastfeeding.
>>
>> Our (UK) initiation stats are about the same (latest survey
>>indicates 81 per cent) but our exclusive rates are much *much*
>>lower.
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> Heather Welford Neil
>> NCT bfc, tutor, UK
> > --
>
--
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|