LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Oct 2013 09:29:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Nikki re-posts this study:

>
>Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jan;97(1):F18-23. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
>
>Randomised trial comparing hand expression with breast pumping for mothers
>of
>term newborns feeding poorly.
>
>Flaherman VJ, Gay B, Scott C, Avins A, Lee KA, Newman TB.


Interesting, because it indicates that the mothers in the trial were 
more likely to be bf at 2 mths if they had used hand expression.

What strikes me here is that both sets of mothers - the pumping ones 
and the hand expressing ones - got such poor yeilds:

>
>RESULTS:
>The median volume of expressed milk (range) was 0.5 (0-5) ml for hand
>expressing
>mothers and 1 (0-40) ml for pumping mothers (p=0.07).


Half a mil? One mil? Seems very strange....

Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor, UK


-- 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2