Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:57:39 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<a06240824cf35483fdfc5@[100.81.37.0]> |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Nikki, I could not find the title or text of the article, only a
>journalist's recap of it, based on an interview with (apparently) one of
>the lead authors. Is the article itself available on line?
>
>Rachel Myr
>Kristiansand, Norway
>ugh, dreading fallout of this
Rachel, Nikki is referring to the same paper I discussed yeaterday:
Colen, C.G., Ramey, D.M., Is Breast Truly Best? Estimating the
Effects of Breastfeeding on Long-term Child Health and Wellbeing in
the United States Using Sibling Comparisons, Social Science &
Medicine (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.027.
It has also been disected by our NHS site that presents the news:
http://www.nhs.uk/news/2014/02February/Pages/Breast-milk-no-better-than-bottled-researcher-claims.aspx?app_data=%7B%22pi%22%3A%2253635_1393521903_7736820%22%2C%22pt%22%3A%22twitter%22%7D
I think my analysis raises better questions than the NHS's, though
mine is briefer, because the NHS does not understand the weakness of
the description of breastfeeding (no indication of excusivity) and
the NHS does not understand the oddity of looking at something like
'behavioural compliance' as an outcome.
Heather Neil, UK
--
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|