LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:11:59 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Hi, Marit.

I don't think this paper criticises the charts - it makes the 
observation that because most UK infants are not fed physiologcally 
*more* of them will appear to be at risk of obesity, because of 
previous benchmarks for this.

This is a dilemma for the healthcare professional and the resarch, 
not a weakness of the charts.

It's been known for some time that the new charts (in use since 2009, 
IIRC) would give rise to this phenomenon.

We need a better way of assessing obesity risk.

Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor,UK
-- 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2