LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original
Date:
Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:40:39 +1000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
"Follow-on" milks not necessary (reference needed)
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<6CA48D5B2A9342F2AA484D0291FB6C32@thorley1>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
From:
vgthorley <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
I need a reference, urgently, that "follow-on" milks are unnecessary for 
artificially-fed infants. I thought there was a statement on this in one or 
more of the earlier reports from APMAIF (the Advisory Panel on Marketing in 
Australia of infant Formula), but I can't find it. Lactnet seemed the place 
to ask.
Many thanks in anticipation.
Virginia
in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2