Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:27:49 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Confirming here that UK law, far from requiring an HCP/IBCLC to
inform a doctor, would explicitly *forbid* a practitioner to inform
another healthcare provider of any issue arising in a consultation
without the clear consent of the person having the consultation.
If a letter or a report has to be done, the norm for the past 30
years has been for HCPs write to other providers and give/send an
identical copy to the patient/client, though I don't think this is a
formal requirement. I know this has not been the case forever,
because it's only in the last 10 years or so that my elderly mother
has felt comfortable about reading these reports/letters - she used
to think it was some sort of snooping. Of course all her children
rolled their eyes at her and put her right - and we're still working
on her *asking* the doctor 'what exactly are these pills? What are
they for? What can I expect them to do?' as she seems to think it's
none of her business.
Point is, that all this deference to doctors is from another age!
The only time it would be permitted for confidentiality to be broken
would be in child/vulnerable adult safeguarding issues.
As a volunteer breastfeeding counsellor, my organisation requires me
to work in the same way.
Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor, UK
--
http://www.heatherwelford.co.uk
http://heatherwelford.posterous.com
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|