Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:59:16 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
A large US insurer provides only a manual/hand pump (outside of covering a
rental for certain medical circumstances such as baby in the NICU, etc--the
rental is not covered for back to work) and all women are given a manual
pump when discharged from the hospital after birth as compliance with the
new law to provide breastfeeding equipment as needed..
There's a lot of controversy among LCs, MDs, etc about this, both pro and
con.
So, what do you think?
Can a full-time working mother maintain exclusive bf with a manual pump?
Do any of you have personal experience with full-time work using only a
manual pump?
Is it a matter of pumping time?
Or do wave forms, suck frequency, etc play a major part in maintaining milk
production?
Any research available?
My concern is that no one kind of pump is appropriate for all mothers, and
that a manual pump is not sufficient for employed mothers (here often back
to work at 6 weeks postpartum, gone for 10 hours a day, 5 days a week).
Thanks, Susan in Berkeley CA
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|