LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phyllis Adamson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 13:25:05 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
So where is the stakeholder input for the new disciplinary procedures?
I'm thinking that if they on dishing out side need lawyers  from inception thru execution (so to speak) then we on the receiving side certainly need lawyers too.
They "fuzzy up" the new CPC, refuse to explain it, then threaten us with expulsion for not adhering to it.
I'm also wondering who and what is motivating this? What was the problem they thought needed to be fixed?

Phyllis

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Device

Elizabeth Brooks <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Jan -- Standard 6.D. is from the NCCA -- the entity whose Standards IBLCE
>must follow, if it is to be granted the right to conduct a certification
>exam.  Think of it as "the JCAHO for IBLCE."
>
>NCCA  accredits over 100 organizations, who administer 150+ certification
>exams.  All of the organizations that conduct certification exams must
>submit fairly onerous applications, and be re-approved by NCCA every five
>years.  IBLCE's current approval lasts through March 2014.  See
>http://www.credentialingexcellence.org/NCCAAccreditation/AccreditedCertificationPrograms/tabid/120/Default.aspx
>
>It is the NCCA that also requires "stakeholder input" -- which they very
>broadly define -- and which accredits organizations (like IBLCE) to offer
>certification examinations once they can demonstrate they protect the
>"public health, safety and welfare" through a competent criterion-based
>examination.
>
>If those buzz-phrases sound familiar, you may recall I posted in September
>2011 about how critically  important it was for IBLCE to include such
>language in the IBLCE Code of Professional Conduct (CPC).  The "draft" CPC
>IBLCE published in August 2011 did NOT have that language.  The final
>version published Nov 2011 DOES have that vital wording (phew!).
>-- 
>Liz Brooks JD IBCLC FILCA
>Wyndmoor, PA, USA
>
>             ***********************************************
>
>Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
>To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
>Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
>COMMANDS:
>1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
>2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
>3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
>4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome




             ***********************************************



Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html

To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]

Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]

COMMANDS:

1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail

2. To start it again: set lactnet mail

3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet

4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome


ATOM RSS1 RSS2