Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 21 May 2011 17:01:36 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mary, what I don't understand is why the babies are being bathed
immediately, instead of having about an hour of skin-to-skin and then being
bathed or washed? As well as delaying the skin-to-skin, bathing robs Mum and
baby of the olfactory sensations that are part of early contact.
What evidence does your hospital have for putting bathing ahead of
skin-to-skin? The evidence I'm aware of supports immediate skin-to-skin.
Virginia
Dr Virginia Thorley, OAM, PhD, IBCLC, FILCA
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
E: [log in to unmask]
On Fri, 20 May 2011 Mary Westra wrote:
Subject:
Hi all,
I am trying to change our hospital practice for newborns from the stressful
scrub a dub under the warmer where they howl,become exhausted and then don't
feed well, to the gentler immersion bath. The problem I am facing is trying
to find a reusable tub that will be acceptable to our infection control
team. Can anyone give me suggestions or policy on this. I find that the
babies usually love the immersion bath and it is less time consuming for the
staff. Baby can go skin to skin after a brief drying.
Thanks,
Mary Westra RN, IBCLC
***********************************************
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|