Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:33:39 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mary writes:
Neither have any respiratory symptoms. Since some of the chemical came in
contact with mom's skin and she also inhaled some of it, she is concerned
about her milk. The chemicals are:
monoammonium phosphate (55-65% concentration)
ammonium sulfate (30-40% concentration)
silica and mica (<1-2% concentration)
My gut is that the absorption would be low and likely not problematic for
the baby. I just thought I'd see if anyone here has any prior experience
with such an issue.
~~~
I remember contacting Judith ( cannot remember her name, sorry) at the NYS
Dept of Health in Albany years ago with a question about two moms who would
be working with volatile chemicals ( regularly: one was working with
embalming fluids, the other with paints) and the bottom line was there were more
chemicals being breathed out onto the baby than would be coming through
the milk. I wonder if this is at all applicable.
Peace,
Judy
Judy LeVan Fram, PT, IBCLC, LLLL
Brooklyn, NY, USA
[log in to unmask]
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|