Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:32:32 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The plaintiff is the lead attorney's wife - so "victim" of tainted formula
is his child as well?
Another interesting look is
http://www.naturalnews.com/029863_Similac_infant_formula.html re: "It's not
the bugs in Similac that make me sick - let's recall the other ingredients
(opinion)"...
K
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Elizabeth Brooks <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> While I am thrilled about this lawsuit as a JD, it disappoints me as an
> IBCLC. The cause of action stems from the yuckiness of the beetle parts.
>
> Too bad they didn't allege that the underlying infant formula, even were it
> prepared in the most pristine and sterile of conditions, is so relentlessly
> and misleadingly marketed, to the detriment of the health of the general
> public, that the manufacturers are liable under those theories of
> "negligence, strict liability, intentional misrepresentation, negligent
> misrepresentation, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of
> merchantability and fitness for particular purpose and unjust enrichment."
>
> I also note the plaintiff bears the same last name as the lead attorney.
> Wife? Sister? Hmm.
>
> --
> Liz Brooks JD IBCLC FILCA
> Wyndmoor, PA, USA
>
--
Karen Gromada
www.karengromada.com/
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|