LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marianne Vanderveen-Kolkena <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Oct 2009 14:10:07 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Elizabeth Brooks" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 1:05 PM
Subject: [LACTNET] Congress Exhibitors

**Hi Liz,

> Marianne -- if you have a Q about any entity's advertising policy, the
> best source to ask is the entity itself -- not Lactnet.

**That's true, to a certain extent. Considering the fact that America is 
still asleep when I look for answers at 10.33 am... ;-) ... I considered 
this to be the fastest resource. Apart from that, we don't always need the 
highest expert. Social cohesion means that you ask your peers first and that 
they can usually help you out. That's the whole idea behind breastfeeding 
organisations. That idea being ingrained in my personality as well as my 
professional attitude, I often turn to Lactnet first, this list being the 
global lactation society. :o))

> But, as luck would have it, I am ILCA's Secy and I can do a convenient
> end-run (talk about a USA-based phrase: that comes from American football)
> and enlighten you.
>
> You have read the ILCA Advertising Policy correctly:  when a company is
> designated a WHO Code-violator, they become ineligible to have a booth at
> the conferences we organize.  Our by-laws mandate that -- a more
> rigourous application of the WHO Code than even the WHO Code requires (as 
> to
> conference exhibitors).
>
> Medela (the particular Code violator you mention) did not have a booth at
> the 2009 ILCA Conference in Orlando.  To be absolutely accurate,
> Medela never sought to have a booth in 2009.  I suspect that is
> because ILCA's position was well-known and widely-publicized in lactation
> circles.  Unless the marketing practices of that company change, they 
> would
> not be eligible to exhibit in 2010, for the same reason.

**That's all very clear; thank you.

> The VELB Conference is run by VELB.  Altho ILCA partnered with VELB in 
> 2008,
> and will do so again in 2010, to "co-host" the conference, VELB retains 
> the
> decision-making powers on everything from conference speakers to its 
> exhibit
> hall.

**Hmmm... I see... I would think it is desirable for VELB to take the same 
stand, but having seen the last edition of 'Laktation und Stillen', I 
suppose they don't (and fear they won't).
The next level in the 'hierarchy' is the Dutch breastfeeding congress, 
organised by the coalition of Dutch breastfeeding organisations (LLL, VBN, 
BFHI-body and Dutch professional lc-organisation), of which only LLL is 
strongly committed to excluding code-violators from advertising. The other 
three don't seem to have problems with M***** because they consider the part 
of the WHO-code concerning bottles and teats 'outdated' in this day and 
age... (See my yesterday's posting; I'm surprised that so far not more 
people have expressed to be shocked by the fact that the BFHI-body allows 
M***** on their posters...)

Warmly,

Marianne Vanderveen IBCLC, Netherlands (and already out of posts for Lactnet 
for today...) 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2