Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:55:39 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear all:
Just a short 10 years ago, my obstetrician was very reluctant to do sonograms. She did
not like exposing the fetus. Now, when I ask how many prospective parents have been
breastfed themselves I get about 70-90% of the class raising their hands, have seen
breastfeeding --- about 30-50% of the class, and have seen their baby on sonogram it is
always 100%. Since this is a group of parents who are convinced they want to try
breastfeeding,there may be more in this group who have been exposed to breastfeeding -
-- but I constantly find it ironic that 100% have seen the fetus whereas half or less have
witnessed breastfeeding before having to do it.
In terms of tongue tie --- remember that we see a self-selected group. We see mothers
and infants who are struggling and so we may be seeing a higher proportion of infants
with tongue tie than in the general population --- or not --- if many of those just give up
and bottle feed.
As for Africa --- yes, there are tongue ties there and the upper labial frenum that causes
spaces between the teeth is probably quite prevalent. The gap between the upper front
teeth is considered a sign of beauty --- just as goiter has been considered a sign of
beauty in certain populations even though goiter too is a sign of a much deeper
physiologic problem.
Remember, it is only in recent human history that we have been keeping track of death
rates. Infant mortality is highest in west and central Africa --- so there may be many
feeding issues that are invisible in those high death rates. The unfortunate tendency to
assume that traditional societies have all the answers tends to gloss over the fact that
there are as many problems there as in industrialized societies --- its just that many of
the problems are different. And as for pollutants, many developing areas of the world
have far more pollutants -- particularly agricultural pollutants because as the dangers of
these chemicals became well enough known to ban these in developed areas, they were
dumped on developing areas of the world.
I have finally found a pediatric ENT that I like for posterior tongue ties. I must confess to
a certain reluctance to refer when I have seen what appears to be badly performed
procedures that then requires repeat procedures. In quiet conversations with my
colleagues, I discovered the same reluctance about the posterior tongue ties. Also, there
may have been incidences of miscommunications whereby parents come away with the
impression that the procedure alone will fix the problem and it does not immediately do
so. Since these conversations usually occur in a group setting, I cannot really speculate
on the exact source of the confusion because I was not party to the original conversations
with any confidence. Merely, there appears to have been a breakdown in either follow up
or communications in some of the cases of posterior and even other types of tongue tie.
Now that I've found someone with both good surgical skills and consistently good bedside
manner, I'll be more confident with my referrals.
When the consequences of one condition are more distant ---- such as when a mother has
a copious supply and the infant appears to thrive on that high supply in the first few
months, it is much harder to establish the connection to that condition in ways that are
plausible and even harder to establish statistical probability. I have not yet seen good
clinical trials on the outcome of the posterior tongue tie, but am starting to see plausible
explanations of potential physiologic consequences. The challenge I find is when is the
procedures necessary and when is it not? Clipping, especially repeat clipping is more
invasive than some of our other interventions and it is sometimes hard for parents to
want to intervene when it involves "cutting". There is some viscerally negative reaction
for many parents when you mention it, despite the fact that circumcision is routinely
practiced in our area due to religious observances.
Best, Susan Burger
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|