Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Oct 2009 12:54:38 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Sender: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I received an email today from ILCA urging members to promote flu vaccination for pregnant women and all infant caregivers. I was disappointed to learn that ILCA is officially getting involved in vaccine promotion. I will not get into the "vaccinate---don't vaccinate debate", but I will say I was disappointed that ILCA is publicly taking a stance. My concerns regarding this official promotion are many.
Informed choice and evidenced based practice have always been my guiding forces. Thimerosal still remains in the multi-dose vials of the flu vaccine despite government recognition that it is harmful substance. In the US manufacturers of vaccines are not liable for vaccine injuries; claims must be made through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. I know of 5 difference H1N1 vaccine manufactures and each formulation raised concerns for me (the inclusion of squalene based adjuncts and the use of thimerosal as a preservative are only 2 examples). Lacking facts and definitive evidenced based information leaves me only with questions. When did vaccine promotion become an IBCLC role.
Perhaps I am the only one concerned with ILCA's stance.
Cassandra Leahy
BA, RN, MSN, LCCE, IBCLC
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|