>
>Heather writes:
>
>None of us here, even looking after our own infant as the constant primary
>caregiver (in the early mornings, late evenings and night, say)
>
>
>~~ I wouldn't actually consider a primary caregiver to be someone who spends
>this small amount of time with a baby, even if this was the baby's mother.
Nor would I....the time is too small. I used this phrase because in
the case in question, posters were saying the father was the constant
primary caregiver, and I was assuming this was the length of time
available for 'constant primary caregiving', as indeed, as you say,
Jaye, is the case in many situations.
> A
>baby's waking hours in this situation would be spent with someone else,
>while the mom is the stand-in for the nanny who is the more constant figure
>between say 7AM and 7PM. This is a common situation where I live,
>actually. With
>solitary sleeping ( and then often layering in sleep training), some babies
>actually spend only an hour or two/day with their moms from Monday-Friday. I
>always wonder what effect this has on attachment.
Actually, the science would be reassuring on that - as long as the
nanny is the same nanny, and does not leave when the child is still
young, and as long as the nanny really loves the baby (both
conditions not always fulfilled). The baby in this situation would
attach to both the nanny and the mother (eventually).
Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor, UK
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|