Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:24:27 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<00b001c8ec0d$98039240$6902a8c0@DFJGBQ91> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I thought the issue with WIC funding was that the Department of Agriculture
had a controlling interest in WIC, and the Division of Dairy was a heavy
hitter in their budget?
Why would WIC pay for someone that might cut funding for their largest
budget item - infant formula? Wisconsin, and Ohio, are HUGE dairy states.
I'm sure their lobby has quite a few dollars floating around.
We used to have a "breastfeeding nurse" with our WIC clinic here, and even
she's been cut. Part of her job was to follow-up with b/f moms and see how
they were doing. It was a wonderful day to get her call, she was a huge
cheerleader and was always so relieved to speak to "you're the ONLY mom I've
spoke with today who's still breastfeeding!" (she must have been very
frustrated!)
Best wishes,
Sam
<<Another problem is some WICs do not even employ an IBCLC! It is state
run, and in Wisconsin they are not required to have one (seems a RD is good
enough for breastfeeding, sigh...) This is a sore point for me as the WIC I
work with as a Peer Counselor does not "have funding" for a IBCLC, even
though I AM one. So what they get is a REALLY over-qualified Peer
Counselor. :( We serve THREE counties. >>
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|