Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 May 2008 00:48:37 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The Royal College of Midwives is the official host of this triennial
congress, which the ICM hold in different countries every time. ICM
strive to move the congresses from one continent to another, and it
usually results in midwifery's role in maternal and child health
getting increased positive attention wherever the congress is held. I
attended for the first time in Vancouver in 1993, and it raised the
roof when a government official announced from the podium that
midwifery would be legalized in British Columbia shortly. I served on
the Scientific Committee for the next congress which was in Oslo in
1996; I am very proud of the congress we held, and there was no
promotion of breastmilk substitutes or exhibits by manufacturers of
same. There were pacifiers on display and probably pump manufacturers
as well. I was too busy during the actual congress to do much besides
concentrate on the scientific program, did not get to visit the
commercial exhibit until it was being dismantled on the last day. But
everyone involved in the Congress knew that there was something called
the WHO Code, if for no other reason than that I never stopped
reminding them.
The host association's awareness of the WHO Code should be without
consequence, because ICM ought to have clear guidelines for hosts on
how to handle the issue. Unfortunately this does not seem to be the
case, and when I looked in at the website just now, I found this
document, a prospectus for potential sponsors and exhibitors at the
congress in Glasgow next month, in which I could find no mention
whatsoever of the Code.
http://www.midwives2008.org/docs/ICM_Industry_Prospectus.pd
I have personally decided not to attend because of their willingness
to accept sponsorship from Martek and I have given that message to the
Secretary General of the ICM.
According to the ICM's own website, they are partners with WABA, so it
is surprising indeed that they don't make use of WABAs expertise in
identifying companies who contravene the Code. If ICM are anything
like midwives on the whole, and they probably are, then breastfeeding
takes a back seat to care during labor and birth. Prenatal care is
also considered more glamorous than postpartum care. Breastfeeding is
the neglected stepchild in midwifery care. So any midwives on this
list would be well advised to contact their national organization and
let them know how you feel about the international confederation
cozying up to biomedical industry.
Cheers
Rachel Myr, not at home and thus not reading even the archives as
thoroughly as I like, here in Norway
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|