LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kay McKee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:22:35 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
In my 2004 edition of Hale (don't have the newer one here)  he mentions one study that found that very high doses--(which he delineates as 600 mg/day) suppress prolactin secretion and therefore milk production, but that this study had since been refuted in two others.  Hale goes on to state that it is not adviseable to take more than 25 mg/day; it is ranked as an L2 BUT AS L4 IN HIGH DOSEs, and is secreted in milk in direct proportion to mother's intake.  He states excessive oral doses"have been reported to produce sedation, hypotonia, and respiratory distress in infants although none have been reported via breastmilk"

"Physician, first do no harm...."  This sounds like a doc that read some brief mention of the high dose lowering prolactin study in a periodical and latched onto it.  Where's the evidence-based practice?  I'd be scared to death of this guy.
Kay McKee, IBCLC

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2