Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:28:06 EDT |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Re: galactocele
I nursed 5 children, for a total of 14yrs with a few pregnancy breaks in
between. I developed a plugged nipple pore towards last few months of lactating.
I worked a bit to relieve it- it kept re-occurring ,my son was almost 4 and
nursing infrequently- it caused no pain so I abandoned the efforts. By the
time he weaned I was left with a small pea-sized painless lump.
Mammogram a few years later at age 40 picked it up, specialists felt it
should be aspirated to determine what the small "lump" was- I told them it was a
galactocele in all likelihood. It was biopsied, found to be a galactocele,
and left alone.
Fast forward 5 yrs to new mammogram technology, and the "galactocele
site"again fell under suspicion- ultrasound was done.
The consulting surgeon determined that the scar tissue from the previous
work at that site was benign, and that to go in and mess around with the area
again would increase the risk of abnormal tissue growth.
Soooo- now at 50, 5 yrs later, yearly mammograms show no changes. I was
grateful for the specialist who felt since it was identified in the first place
as a galactocele, it requires no treatment, but is watched for changes. I do
inherently believe that to mess around and repeatedly disturb tissue is a bad
idea.
Hope this helps-
Lucia Jenkins RN,IBCLC
Wakefield, Ma 01880
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|