LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Morgan Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:08:36 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Given the supplementing for 'breastfeeding jaundice'  (ugh) felt it 
appropriate to post here.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6949700.stm

Full text - - - -

Early cord clamping may harm baby
*Clamping the umbilical cord straight after birth does not benefit 
mother or baby and may actually be harmful, a UK expert has warned. *

Instead, leaving the cord for around three minutes can boost the baby's 
iron stores, cutting the risk of anaemia.

Babies born prematurely would particularly benefit from delayed clamping 
where it is safe to do so, a British Medical Journal paper said.

Experts recommended mothers-to-be discuss the issue with their midwife.

Early clamping is widely used as part of "active birth management" 
guidelines, which have been shown to prevent the mother haemorrhaging 
immediately after birth.


	*It wouldn't be a big step not to clamp the cord for a while, and 
that's what nature intended *
Professor Andrew Shennan, obstetrician

But Dr Andrew Weeks, senior lecturer in obstetrics at the University of 
Liverpool, said although some steps were important, there was no 
evidence that clamping the cord immediately had any benefit for the mother.

In the baby, evidence has shown that allowing the cord blood to keep 
flowing for a few minutes increases the iron stores.

In the developing world, where anaemia is a big problem, practices have 
now changed to delay clamping and the World Health Organization has 
dropped early clamping from its guidelines.

*Reluctance *

Dr Weeks, who is also a practising obstetrician, said it was time to 
reconsider the practice in the UK.

"It would never be implemented now if it wasn't part of standard 
practice, but people are reluctant to remove it because it's part of 
current culture.

"There is now considerable evidence that early cord clamping does not 
benefit mothers or babies and may even be harmful."

He recommended waiting three minutes in healthy babies but said the 
issue was more complicated in babies born prematurely or by caesarean 
section even though they would perhaps benefit the most.

"For them a policy of 'wait a minute' would be pragmatic," he added.

There have been concerns that in healthy babies delaying clamping could 
increase the risk of jaundice, but a recent study in the US suggested 
this was not the case.

Professor Andrew Shennan, spokesperson for the baby charity Tommy's, 
said it was not currently routine to delay clamping.

"It wouldn't be a big step not to clamp the cord for a while, and that's 
what nature intended.

"Asking a midwife to do that is a perfectly reasonable request - this is 
an area we need to look at."

Pat O'Brien, obstetrician and spokesperson for the Royal College of 
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, said the profession needed to go back and 
look at the evidence again.

"It's always been a question of risks and benefits, but time of clamping 
hasn't really been looked at before."

But he added there were exceptions when it would be dangerous to delay 
clamping because the baby needed medical support.
- - - -

Morgan Gallagher

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2