Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:55:38 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In the UK, our standard charts - which are not in use, as far as I
know, outside the UK - are not due to be reviewed until 2010, and I
doubt very much that anything official will happen until then.
Discussions are taking place, however.
I think it's excellent that the WHO charts are available easily to
parents direct over the internet. I don't recognise Morgan's 'huge
groundswell of mothers ' though. It's true that the impetus to use
them, such as it is, comes mainly from mothers, even so.
I do think there are questions to be asked about their universal use,
with formula and mixed fed babies.
The charts in current UK use - based on babies whose feeding is not
differentiated - are a reflection of babies as they *are* - mixed
fed, early solids, breastfed for a short time only - they are all in
there, undifferentiated. The WHO charts reflect babies as they
(almost certainly) *ought* to be. How far should any baby's growth be
manipulated to 'fit' the chart? I don't know. Maybe formula fed
babies need to be 'allowed' to get bigger - maybe the physiological
growth of a non-physiologically-fed baby is like that.
I don't see a great problem with the current UK charts, in fact. I
see a problem with the way they are used, and the poor training of
the HCPs who use them.
Adoption of the WHO charts will not resolve this at all.
Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor, UK
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|