Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 14 May 2007 11:34:20 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Marcia said this:
"Hi Ines,
I think this is just another example of recommending formula 'just to be safe'.
In other words, whenever considering whether or not the mother should
breastfeed, the known risks of NOT breastfeeding need to be weighed against
the hypothetical risks of breastfeeding. So yes, it's good to take a look at the
risk to the baby of contracting Hep C, but is that risk greater than the known
risks of not breastfeeding? To decrease the risk of infection is it worth it to
greatly increase the risk of NEC, respiratory infections, SIDS, etc? May be
you can dialog with the doctors to try to answer that question."
Thank you all LactNetters who took the time to answer to my post. A number
of you mentioned other resources that state that it is not contraindicated to
breastfeed with hep C. I appreciate your effort however, I had already
clarified in my post that I am keenly aware that it is NOT contraindicated.
Somehow, I don't think (I already tried, by the way) giving these
doctors/pediatricians more of the same would be helpful in addressing the
concern.
Now, thank you for the above post. However, no I don't agree that this just
another scheme to get more babies to be given formula. I don't think that the
risk of hep C is or should be understated. With my post I was looking more at
what others are experiencing in other places. For example, are your doctors
saying it is OK to breastfeed with hep C? Thank you. Ines Anchondo
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|