Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:02:02 +0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 19/04/2007, at 12:43, Chris Mulford wrote:
> Well, there at the RMH you have a lot of parents under stress, with
> children
> that they want to protect, and there are probably lots of things
> they wish
> their kids didn't have to see: other kids with scars or bandages or
> amputations or no hair or tubes sticking out of their noses. And
> they have
> to explain all this to their kids and reassure them about these scary
> sights. The sight of a nursing toddler might just push somebody
> over the
> edge of her or his stress quota for that day, and I think the
> nursing moms
> should be sensitive to that reality.
I couldn't disagree with this more, and I believe that casting this
in terms of the _mother_ being required to be more "civil and polite"
is completely backwards. The people being uncivil and impolite are
those complaining about nursing, and those breaking the law by
attempting to place conditions and restrictions on it.
A nursing child is an oasis of beautiful, nurturing, NORMAL parenting
within this stressful, abnormal environment. None of the parents of
children with scary looking medical issues is being required to
trumpet a warning of their presence, nor to cover the child up when
he or she appears in the communal area. The child being discriminated
against illegally is scared, frightened, and ill. Who is caring for
his needs?
Lara Hopkins
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|