Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 May 2007 14:35:16 -0700 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<00cb01c79324$23880150$2f01a8c0@amd2100> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Pat, I was thinking the same thing. I also continue to wonder what good an
entire ounce of formula does when they inevitably throw up most, if not all
of it. How they expect a 30 minute old newborn to take down an ounce is
beyond me. Some babies can, but most will not. I wonder if they are
forcing feeding tubes down these little ones. At my hospital, the rules are
not quite as stringent (not EVERY baby gets a stick, but the ones with risk
factors do). However, I have seen an awful lot of feeding tubes going down
babies who simply cannot eat as much as the docs want. It doesn't stop them
from throwing up, but I think they can at least document that they put
something DOWN. Shaking my head.
I second your better suggestion. How about pushing a campaign to get EVERY
baby to the breast immediately after birth (where possible)? Again...
scratching my head.
Christina Harris, RN
Seattle, WA
On 5/10/07, Pat Young <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> or as Jack used to say AAAARRRGGGHHH
>
> How about getting baby to breast in 1st 30 min before they do a blood
> draw?
>
> What research are they basing the 30 min draw and level on?
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|