Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:24:30 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Dec 29, 2006, at 1:19 PM, LACTNET automatic digest system wrote:
> Nursing staff and practitioners should instead educate families and
> support their decision to limit visitations and/or assist them in how
> best to manage this, but to determine the rules and apply them in the
> most convenient way for staff is no different than requiring a mother
> to birth on her back. This is controlling and manipulative.
IME, first time mothers in particular find it very hard to set this
boundary. The guilt tripping from the extended family and friends can
be significant. Someone has to protect the baby.
I would have saved $3k in out of pocket medical expenses for my son if
someone had kicked all our homebirth visitors out. And this was
*after* we had publicly (by a mass email and in the church announcement
list) stated that we did not want visitors for the first couple of
days.
Personally I think mothers would be relieved to know the rules. It
isn't considered manipulative to limit visitors to ICUs and CCUs,
because it protects the patient. Isn't it the same deal in OB?
Besides, after all of 24-48 hours, the mom will be home anyway.
Lynn in MO
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|