Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:39:44 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nina,
you asked:
I am wondering when the risks associated with
slow growth begin to outweigh the risks associated with supplementation.
Has anyone done or seen any research on this?
During my Phd researches, begun in 1999, thought this was a really key
question, and I searched. I didn't find anything, which may not mean that
there isn't anything, but no one has come up to me to tell me about it after
my papers have been published, etc. I think it is astonishing that we don't
have investigation of this issue. I think it really illuminates our culture
and supervaluing of weight gain over other well-baby measures. Of course,
it is complex as to how our culure came to this and how we exported it.
Obviously there is some physiological oxymoronic truth to the value for
infant growth!! But we have it all out of proportion, in a lot of
interesting ways.
Magda Sachs, PhD.
Breastfeeding Supporter, BfN, UK
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|