LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Margaret G. Bickmore" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:29:56 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
I often cite the references in LLLI's Breastfeeding Answer Book on 
starting solids later than 6 months.

Naylor and Morrow (2001) examined four biological systems in mother 
and baby:  the baby's immune system, the baby's gastrointestinal 
development, the baby's oral-motor development, and the effects of 
breastfeeding on the mother's fertility.  They concluded that the 
appropriate time to introduce solids was six to eight months. 
http://www.pronutrition.org/files/Developmental%20Readiness.pdf  (44 
pages)

Pisacane (1995) found that babies who were exclusively breastfed for 
seven months or longer had significantly higher hemoglobin levels at 
one and two years of age than breastfed babies who received solid 
foods earlier than seven months. 
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7658275&dopt=Citation>

Borresen (1995) determined that many babies did fine with exclusive 
breastfeeding past 6 months, and recommended that "In developing 
countries, health authorities and non-governmental organisations 
should actively endorse exclusive breastfeeding for eight to nine 
months to protect infants against malnutrition and infections." 
http://jhl.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/3/201

As an LLL Leader, I have known many babies who did not start solid 
foods until after 6 months.  In my opinion it is actually quite 
normal for 'ecologically breastfed' babies to go on exclusively 
breastfeeding for 7-8 months, and 9-10-11 months is not unusual.  In 
the cases I am familiar with, it was clearly the baby's choice to 
remain exclusively breastfed, and all of them grew and developed just 
fine.  In some cases, food sensitivities were an issue.

I am not at all concerned when a baby continues exclusively 
breastfeeding as the first birthday approaches, as long as growth and 
development are within normal ranges.  And even if something seemed 
to be amiss with the baby, I would not suspect exclusive 
breastfeeding as the problem.  I would regard it as a safety net 
protecting the baby as we figure out the real problem.

The "Rapley Method" is my personal favorite description of how babies 
should begin solid foods. 
<http://www.borstvoeding.com/voedselintroductie/vast_voedsel/rapley_guidelines.html>

Margaret Bickmore
mom of 3, LLLL, APL
Longmont, CO USA

>Hi,
>I am the editor of the Swedish breastfeeding magazine 'Amningsnytt' 
>and I would like to know how you think about introducing solids. The 
>Swedish breastfeeding recommendation says that from around six 
>months the breastmilk should be supplemented nutritionally. I would 
>like your opinions on children who are not interested in other foods 
>than breastmilk even after 6 months. Due to the latest national 
>breastfeeding statistics, 1 % of children age nine months were still 
>exclusively breastfed. Would you be concerned for the health for 
>these children? How should parents think if their child shows no 
>interest for solids at age 7, 8 or 9?
>Marit Olanders,
>editor of Amningsnytt

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2