LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jennifer Tow, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:45:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
I agree with Karleen. We have tried to make breasfeeding so special in 
our efforts to market it that we have misled a lot of mothers. How many 
moms have you heard say they want to give up on trying to solve 
breastfeeding difficulties "so that they can enjoy their babies"? I 
always think--you won't much enjoy the long-term consequences, but the 
mother has been taught that breastfeeding is lovely and wonderful and 
special. Sort of like a wedding day or a honeymoon or some other rite 
of pasage. AIM companies have joyfully cooperated in perpetuating that 
myth, b/c it means that when we return to reality we will do what 
people do in their ordinary lives--artificially-feed their babies.

This is where I also have a distaste for "meeting the mother where she 
is". What about meeting the baby where she is? The baby is , 
biologically-speaking, always prepared to feed at the breast. So, why 
is it our duty to force the baby to submit to the mother's will, rather 
than advocate for the baby? Lest anyone think I believe in forced 
breastfeeding, I am only pointing out the imbalanced absurdity of the 
position I see most HCPs take--make the mom happy, make her life easy, 
don't make her feel guilty. What would breastfeeding advocacy and 
support look like if the baby mattered, too?

When I think about my personal ethics (which I often do), I would say 
that always being attentive to hearing the voice of the baby is 
intrinsic to my sense of ethics. What confounds me is how this would 
not be so for any human being, and therefore any system designed by 
humans. IMO, a system that neglects this basic need is flawed, 
irrelevent and obsolete. I daresay, though, that we are deeply 
challenged to assist a mother in hearing her baby unless we help her 
heal her own early wounds as well.

Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA
Intuitive Parenting Network LLC
http://healinghumanpotential.blogspot.com/

-
Karleen wrote:
Ah but you see I think that it can...I think that we shoot ourselves in 
the
foot by always maintaining that it is something "special" when in 
reality it
is just as normal as providing personal hygiene for babies etc. You 
wouldn't
want mothers to hate it but I can't see anything wrong with them doing 
it
because they know that the alternative is not good for their babies.
Karleen Gribble
Australia

  Breastfeeding is such a profound, important relationship that it
> can't possibly be compared to other things that need to be done for
children
> ie. nappies and washing.
>
> Clare
> UK
>


________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and 
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from 
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2