Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:05:22 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Without getting into whether or not ALL babies need moreVit. D than they get naturally, I would much rather see the recommendation stated more as follows:
"Babies today need more Vitamin D than they typically can get from sunlight. If the baby is formula fed, the Vitamin D has been added to the formula at the factory (a subtle reminder that ABM is a manufactured product, not a natural one!). If breastfed, baby can be given vitamin D drops."
This avoids making it seem that breastmilk is deficient. Without the added Vitamin D, formula is also short on it. It's a matter of how it gets to the baby, not whether one is "deficient". The circumstances in today's world that leads to concerns about sufficiency of Vit. D have nothing to do with how the infant is fed, so let's not make it seem like it is!
Winnie
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|