LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Date:
Mon, 1 Jan 2007 20:37:25 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Barbara Berges <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Did anyone notice that the original study had just 138 subjects enrolled?
This is not enough of a sample size to indicate whether these formula
additives are safe or not.

Why is it that breastfeeding studies are not accepted as valid and valuable
even when much larger numbers are studied, but formula gets a pass with
these smaller numbers?

Barb Berges, BS, RN, IBCLC
near Cleveland, Ohio

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2