Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:12:19 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Winifred Mading <[log in to unmask]> posted:
>I seem to recall the suggestion that a lactating mom needing a mammo
>should inquire about an ultrasound instead as it is easier to distinguish
>dense tissue from lactation from dense tissue that may be of concern. It
>makes sense to me, as when I have had a suspicious spot on a mammo they
>then check with ultrasound (which fortunately was
>negative!). Unfortunately, insurance seems reluctant to pay for
>ultrasound instead, but only after a mammo, and in my experience with less
>coverage.
I had a breast ultrasound done 15 months after my son's birth. There was no
demand to have a mammogram first, but I suspect that my breastfeeding, my
age (35), and the area that needed a closer look (the very fringes of
breast tissue going into the underarm) were considerations.
As a side note, I just got a "birthday card" from my HMO this year for my
40th birthday. On the outside, was a cheery "Happy Birthday!" On the
inside, all sorts of grim statistics about breast cancer and the dire need
for me to have a mammogram RIGHT NOW. Not a scrap of info about
breastfeeding though.
I will have to take that up with them.
regards,
Julia
Julia R. Barrett
Freelance Science Writer & Editor
Mom to Sean (6) and Kira (2 going on 20)
Madison, Wisconsin
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|