Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:34:37 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Betsy writes:
If each LC is giving evidence based information which happens to contradict
the physician (whose bogus information is wrong and therefor
NOT evidence based) the onus is on the PHYSICIAN to produce evidence to
support his information. What are some of you so afraid of in this case?
~ I haven't heard anyone here express fear of speaking to another health
care provider or that a physician would "yank their certification". What I read
in these posts is that our own licensing body is taking away this very
ability that you describe, leaving us able to offer evidence-based information only
if it does not contradict what a HCP is saying. This puts us in conflict
constantly with the aims of our own professional ethics, scope of practice and
clinical competencies. The concern is that we are both being held to be
competent and silent about our competency's information. What I read in these posts
is professional concern that our own body has revved us up, full of good,
solid information and skills, and then thrown us in neutral. As the S of P now
reads, the onus is not on the physician to prove the wrong information at
all, because we are not allowed to provide any, within our S of P.
In short, everyone will lose, especially the families who deserve the
information, and my certification would not be lost, but forfeited, by me.
Peace,
Judy
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|