LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Heleen en Harmen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 May 2006 22:13:33 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
On 25 May 2006 at 15:01, heather wrote:

> >Well this shows up some of the cultural differences on Lactnet and those of
> >us outside of the US look at this with different eyes. The word that comes
> >up in my mind when I think of mothers being forceably separated from their
> >little babies because "they knew what they were signing up for" is probably
> >too inflamatory to post on Lactnet.
> >Karleen Gribble
> >Australia
> >
> >>  Maybe they do. Maybe your law is wrong. I know Lactnet is not a place
> >>  for political debate, but I feel this issue has a lot to do with
> >>  breastfeeding.
> >>  I believe the soldiers who are contemplating getting pregnant know
> >>  intellectually they will have to go back to the military after giving
> >>  birth, but that is not the same as the reality when it hits you.
> >>  Shouldn't American law protect these mothers, and more importantly,
> >>  their children, the future of the nation?
> >>  --
> >>  Heleen Hayes
> >  www.xs4all.nl/~hhayes
> 
> Heleen's first language is not English, I gather,  and I think you 
> have interpreted her incorrectly, Karleen.
> 
> I understood her to be saying that these mothers knew 'in their 
> heads' what might be happening, but when it became a reality (ie they 
> were going to have to leave their babies),  they felt differently; 
> there is a case for protecting the mothers of nurslings from being 
> expected to serve in the front line, or anywhere they cannot be with 
> their babies. She was suggesting that the law could protect these 
> mothers and babies by making it illegal for a mother to be forced to 
> separate from her nursling.
> 
> I don't think Heleen was meaning 'we shouldn't care about them 
> because they knew they would be separated'.

I have e-mailed with Karleen and she and I think very much alike on 
this subject. But you explain part of my feelings too. What I meant, 
and was trying to say very carefully in English - which is indeed not 
my mother tongue, which makes it pretty difficult to be diplomatic - 
that the present law is doing the mothers and baby's and the nation 
wrong. Wether the moms breastfeed or bottle feed, I feel it is wrong 
to separate them at such a young age (which includes 4 months or 6 
months old, I know many moms need to leave their children in the care 
of others during their jobs, but the difference is that they get home 
after the working day). 
I can understand that American people say 'They knew what they were 
up to beforehand', but as Ann expained so clearly, they didn't. 
-- 
Heleen Hayes
www.xs4all.nl/~hhayes

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2