LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charity Pitcher-Cooper <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 02:51:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
Just a case study to consider-

I had a slightly different case about 5 years ago.   (I was actually there for a consult because the 
baby would not latch- tongue sucker- big time.)  Mom showed signs and symptoms of a primary 
chicken pox outbreak about 5 hours after the birth of her baby (very quick 3 hour labor for a first 
time mom).  Normally the doctor would have strongly advised, removal the baby from Mom's care 
and had Mom pump and give milk, but they were all unsure of what to do since this Mom had a 
positive varicella titer in her chart within the past year.  Before she was pregnant, She had asked 
for the chicken pox vaccine (she is a teacher) because she had never had the chicken pox.  The 
doctor ordered a titer and her request was turned down by her HMO after her titer came back with 
sufficient antibodies in her blood.   When she presented with chicken pox in the hospital so soon 
after the birth of her baby, the doctors did not know what to do.  I gave the parents the 
information I had from Lawrence, Riordan and Auerbach and my Breastfeeding Answer Book.  The 
thinking at that time?   If she has antibodies in her blood to begin with, then they should be in the 
milk, and the baby was already exposed in utero (perhaps that is why her little girl made a hasty 
exit at 38 weeks).  The questions- Was breastfeeding with Mom going to expose her more than 
when she was in utero?  What was more detrimental- formula and denile of a mother's loving care 
or longer exposure to the chicken pox?  After many calls to two local children's hospitals and a 
conference with Mom, the doctors decided to treat this like a case of chicken pox in the family and 
encouraged her to keep nursing.  If I remember correctly, they gave Immuno-globulin/and anti 
viral meds and left it at that.  Baby did get the chicken pox, a very mild case, about two and a half 
weeks later.  Baby did very well and had no problems...

I don't think this was something the doctors were taking lightly, but they did take into account this 
Mom's strong desire to breastfeed and presented her with all of the risks and possible outcomes.  
If the baby had contracted chicken pox within the first seven days, there would have been no 
telling if she had contracted it from mom in uetero or afterwards.  Bottom line was that they really 
did not know what would happen, but erred on the protection and superior nutrition of 
breastmilk.  This practice was not particularly breastfeeding friendly (they had mom pump and 
dump for a week for an antibiotic for Bacterial vaginosis (BV) when the baby was about 15 months 
old- poor Mom never did get babe back to breast). 

Wamly,

Charity M. Pitcher-Cooper BSN, RN, CBE  

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2