Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:26:15 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1252" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
(Hi Nikki)! Thanks for the link, I found the article very informative and
thought-provoking. Interesting too, to think about the fact that if
babies are breastfed they get fewer infections and thereby are less likely
to be prescribed antibiotics. Also,in addition to babies who are born via
c-section, are those born vaginally who are whisked away for procedures or
bathing and given to Dad or someone else to hold before they are skin-to-
skin with mom at increased risk? Is it logical to think that a baby who is
bathed prior to the first breastfeeding would not latch on to mom with the
same bacteria as an unbathed one? Is the unbathed baby's condition
necessary to expose mom to bacteria also, completing the cycle of
producing immunity in the breastmilk? Have I overthought this? I find the
idea fascinating and like to think that the baby has a purpose for the mom
too, not just the other way around. Sorry everybody if I strayed too far
off topic today.
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|