LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pamela Morrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:45:12 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
Nikki

Bravo for sending in such a frank and honest appraisal of what happened and 
what you said to the mom of a 2-day-old who stopped breastfeeding in your 
hospital.  You have described something which I believe concerns us 
all.  That, in order to avoid inducing guilt in a mother who can 
breastfeed, but for whatever reason chooses not to, we are currently 
duty-bound to support the mother's own feeding choices, effectively 
abandoning the baby to the consequences.  I know something of how you feel 
because I've done this too - far too often.  In practice, even though we 
feel bad about doing it, it's an easy way out.  We're able to look at the 
ethical guidelines of our professional organizations, and even 
international organizations whose focus is health, and tell ourselves that 
we're actually *supposed* to do this.  And we can look the mother in the 
eye, and say Fine, dear - that's your choice.  But it's not possible to 
look at the baby and tell ourselves that we've done the best by him, is 
it?  And that's what makes you and I, and many other LCs, so extremely 
uncomfortable!

What is it about our present social and societal norms that just accepts 
that a mother should not be made to feel guilty, but that her baby can 
casually be condemned to a life of poorer health without even a hint of 
responsibility or accountability?  I feel tremendously uneasy about 
this.  And I think that many of us around the world, in separate places, 
are beginning to see this issue in a new light and to question it.

When we counsel a mother about infant feeding, and give her as much 
information as we can in the 5 minutes or 15 minutes or 75 minutes we have 
available, we give her the information and then place responsibility for 
making the choice about how she feeds her baby on the mother.  By doing 
this, in effect we are saying that while breastmilk and breastfeeding are 
the best things she can do for her baby, ultimately whether she chooses not 
to breastfeed doesn't really matter - her freedom of choice is the most 
important thing - more important, in fact, than her baby's 
health/survival.  This ultimately trivializes the importance of her milk 
for her baby.  If it really mattered, we would be making a clear 
recommendation to breastfeed.  I think we often confuse the mother's 
capacity to breastfeed with her right to choose.  A mother who is prevented 
from breastfeeding, (by physical constraints, emotional barriers, an 
unsupportive spouse/employer/doctor etc.) has diminished capacity, and she 
should feel angry about not being able to breastfeed, not guilty.  In 
addition, she has a claim on society generally to remove those constraints 
so that she can breastfeed.  The baby, especially, has a claim on society 
to enable his mother to breastfeed him.

Instead of worrying about whether we will make a mother feel guilty about 
not breastfeeding, it may be necessary for us to speak up about the value 
of breastfeeding to her baby, and the risks of unnecessarily feeding 
breastmilk substitutes.  If mothering and breastfeeding were valued more, 
this would elevate a mother's sense of worth, as well as perhaps shame her 
- and others - into placing the baby at the centre of the decision.

IMHO there is no longer a place for knowingly allowing a mother to make a 
poor choice.  This is abandonment of the mother and of the baby.  I feel 
that, on the contrary, because this is our field of expertise, we have a 
responsibility to the baby to make a clear recommendation about 
breastfeeding.  As should up to date paediatricians, doctors, and all 
healthcare staff - and policy-makers.  Society as a whole could have been 
forgiven for elevating mother's choice above the health of the baby when 
the state of medical knowledge about breast and bottle was such that the 
differences were not clear.  But we know better now.  And LCs - whose field 
of expertise and knowledge this is - know more than most. That knowledge 
places a responsibility on us to re-examine the 
counselling/choice/responsibility/accountability issue.

Thanks for bringing this up so frankly Nikki.  I think we, as a profession, 
need to give this some thought, and talk about it some more.

Pamela Morrison IBCLC
Rustington, England
[log in to unmask]
---------------------
Date:    Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:53:19 EST
From:    Nikki Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: professional fear of inducing guilt vs desire for control

Dear Friends:
     I saw a day-2 mom of 2 in the hospital today. She  has changed her mind
and bailed out. She is bottle feeding now.
     "Nerves," she said, and "......20-month old"  and, "if the doctor wants
to prescribe something for my nerves, it's  better if I am not" and, (THE REAL
CLINCHER ):
      "I know it's best for the  baby.................and if the doctor had
told me  when I asked if I was  doing something not good, I would have stayed
with it............but he said  okay when I told him I was changing to
bottle-feeding."
     This is how our fear of guilt ("don't make  mother feel guilty") cost
this baby some chances for a healthier life. "Oh, it  doesn't matter if you
switch" we are encouraged to say, when a new mother, our  sister, asks us 
directly
if she is making a poor choice."
     I did the same thing; I didn't question her at all.
     If she had said, "I am not buying a carseat" or  "It's okay if I smoke
cigarettes as long as I don't blow the smoke on the baby"  , you all can bet
that I would have reacted freely! Why should there be a  difference?
     I did show my disappointment, though.
     I saw it as the one thing she CAN refuse, after  having two babies 20
months apart with a planned return to employment in only 3  months and very
little help at home, once her husband goes back to work in 2  weeks.
     What do you all think?
     I still wish that the doctor and that I had been  honest. "You know, I
think you are overwhelmed right now and making a decision  based on that. 
It is
a big deal if you don't breastfeed, and I am professionally  obligated to do
the right thing and tell you the truth. I assume you are an  adult and will
balance the options for yourself after that.  If you feel  lousy about your
decision, and you are already ambivalent, that will be a  motivator, not a
punishment."  This said gently and firmly, the way we  touch a baby.
     warmly,

Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CCE
Maternal-Child Adjunct  Faculty Union Institute and University
Film Reviews Editor, Journal of Human  Lactation
www.breastfeedingalwaysbest.com

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2