Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:51:35 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Where can I find a study that reveals the importance of breastmilk as the
primary source of nutrtion, to be offered before complimentary foods in the
first year of life? I have searched the AAP pages but have not found anything
clearly related to this. I received a call tonight from a concerned mom of a
nine month old who is doing well, gaining weight appropriately and has met
appropriate milestones, which are impressive since he was a premie. He has
been happily breastfeeding all along and was started on solids at around 6
months. He eats a few times a day following breastfeeding. When the mom saw the
pediatrician today (one of my favorites and the one my own kids go to!), he
said that the baby should be eating way more solids, that they should be the
main source of his diet, that breastmilk was not as important anymore, should
not be offered until after the baby "eats a meal", and that the baby "could
not take in enough of this liquid to get calories"-- whatever on earth that
meant. If we were talking "water" then yes, that is true. Cows milk, rice
milk, soy milk - yep, I agree. BUT BREASTMILK??? This is not just liquid --
it is mega nutrition. So, what would be the best study or fact filled info
sheet I could send this doc? Thanks, Ann
Ann Conlon-Smith, IBCLC Triangle Lactation Consultants
_www.trianglelactation.com_ (http://www.trianglelactation.com/)
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|