Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 5 Aug 2005 07:51:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I hadn't seen the AAFP-affiliated familydoctor.org before. Odd that the
breastfeeding support would be so lackluster, given the AAFP's
breastfeeding position <http://www.aafp.org/x6633.xml>. This seems to me to
be a stronger statement than that of the AAP and more supportive of things
such as tandem nursing and nursing beyond infancy. Their opinion on formula
use is rather blunt:
"Current attitudes concerning infant nutrition have been molded by the
manufacturers of human milk substitutes who have aggressively created
markets for their products. They have advertised to physicians and directly
to the public in ways that are inconsistent with the International Code of
Marketing for Human Milk Substitutes (see Appendix 3).115 While much of the
literature about breastfeeding distributed by formula companies is factual,
omissions and images can mislead mothers, reinforce misconceptions about
breastfeeding, and suggest that breastfeeding mothers also need to use
formula. Physicians have been used to convey this advertising and encourage
brand loyalty through "free" literature and formula samples.48 Use of
commercial literature and samples has been demonstrated to decrease
breastfeeding rates and increase premature weaning.112"
regards,
Julia
Julia R. Barrett
Freelance Science Writer & Editor
Mom to Sean (5) and Kira (on the brink of 2)
Madison, Wisconsin
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|