Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:14:13 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Teresa Pitman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Purely anedotal/observational:
<...>
By my estimate, I would say that the number of women I have worked with who
are truly physically not able to lactate is less than one percent. Maybe
half of one percent. Some of those who I would have said fit that category
in the past might well have been helped by Domperidone, which we weren't
using 25 years ago!
***
Thank you, Theresa.
That was my calculation as well, actually.
Does anyone know were those often circulating numbers of 2 or 5% true lactation impossibility might com from?
Warmly,
Gonneke,
Dutch IBCLC, living in Germany, teaching in Belgium
(``''**~**''``}:{``''**~**''``)
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|