Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 07:53:14 EST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
NABA's Spring 2002 newsletter contains an article written about this
worldwide study on preventing diabetes. The protocol for the study is frightening.
It involves the randomized weaning of breastfed infants susceptible to
diabetes to a either a cow's milk based formula or Nutramigen, a hydrolyzed formula
which is hypoallergenic, not non-allergenic. This formula still contains
cow's milk protein. Parents will not be informed as to which formula their infant
is being weaned to, the one with low potential for triggering diabetes or
the one with high potential. Mead Johnson is a sponsor of this study. I looked
at the purely financial aspect of Mead Johnson's investment in this study.
Nutramigen is very expensive. In Massachusetts a 32oz can of ready-to-feed
costs $7, a 16oz can of the powdered form costs $20. If the study babies are
breastfed 3 months and weaned to Nutramigen for the next 7 months and if parents
had to pay for the formula, families would spend about $1400 for the
ready-to-feed and $1120 for the powdered form. Compare this to standard formula at
$4.99 for the liquid and $12.89 for the powdered and depending where in the USA
you live, parents will be paying up to 60% more for this product. What a
windfall for Mead Johnson if they can convince parents to breastfeed for a
minimal amount of time and switch to their expensive formula.
Looks to me like this $50 million study will be a giant marketing forum for
Nutramigen. The problem with the protocol also involves what parents are not
told about using this formula. Hydrolyzed formulas can cause loose watery
stools and nutrient loss, reduced growth, altered metabolic parameters, with high
molecular weight corn proteins still present in this formula possibly
contributing to corn allergy, Nutramigen tastes terrible. Will the babies weaned
to this after a certain age even accept it? The AAP's 1994 work group on
diabetes and cow's milk protein recommended that genetically susceptible infants
not be given intact cow's milk protein, yet it appears that one group of these
study babies will be given exactly that.
I have been cautioning health care providers to consider recommending
against encouraging parents to sign up for this study. How it was approved raises
many questions in my mind. Too bad the $50 couldn't be used to support
breastfeeding which would considerably reduce the risk for diabetes in the first
place.
Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC
Weston, MA
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|