Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 May 2005 07:23:02 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 5/11/2005 12:08:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
Both of the supplemented formulas were linked to better developmental
outcomes than the unsupplemented formula, Dr. Deborah A. Diersen-Schade,
from Mead Johnson Nutritionals in Evansville, Indiana, and colleagues
report.
Dear Colleagues:
How interesting that the company found its product was best. What a
surprise. And now I will extract my tongue from the hole in my cheek!
This finding is opposite to Makrides, and the Cochrane Data Base which
found that supplemented formulae weren't any better for premies or for term
babies than the old standards............................and no formulae were
as good as human milk.
warmly,
Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CCE
Maternal-Child Adjunct Faculty Union Institute and University
Film Reviews Editor, Journal of Human Lactation
Support the WHO Code and the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|