Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 21:42:13 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ellen,
Welcome back to the List. Perhaps this may be of interest to you and others.
I recently had an email exchange with a colleague who had seen the article
and asked what we could say to others who brought it up as a negative about
breast milk. Please feel free to tweak this but here's my message to her. Some
of it is courtesy of an email from Jane Heinig, editor of JHL, who sent a
rebuttal to the WSJ article. The bolded statements are from her and the rest
are my words.
"The Wall Street Journal reported only that antioxidant activity decreased
in breast milk after storage while the antioxidant activity in formula
remained stable, not that breast milk had significantly better antioxidant activity
than formula no matter how it was stored"
This is the KEY statement to share with anyone who mis-interprets this
"study" - that formula "remains stable" because it has NO living components and
does not change - BUT it's activity is lower than breast milk to begin with. I
am going to memorize the last sentence in that paragraph and suggest that all
LCs and Breastfeeding advocates do the same.
It's all in the interpretation of information and I believe that the
anti-breastfeeding forces always put a negative spin on it no matter what it really
says."
Mary Kay Smith, RN, IBCLC
Canton MI
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|