Dear Friends:
The last time I checked, Medela had no safety and efficacy studies to
support the use of the Hazelbaker fingerfeeder.
While there appear to be a variety of reasons for using finger feeding,
where are the published studies that show that finger feeding helps babies to
breastfeed?
Not all bottle nipples collapse, especially when they are brand new.
How many LCs are academically trained in OT/SLP assessment and
techniques of tongue exercises? If babies are having airway protection problems, LCs
are not the ones to be diagnosing and treating such, although we are certainly
part of the health care team.
According to Wolf and Glass, babies with tongue tip elevation (commonly
premature infants), elevate their tongue tip as a means of stabilization when
there is decreased tone and stability in the head, neck and trunk. They
recommend providing postural support (1992 edition, p. 237). They suggest "quick
swiping or vibration to the tongue tip, followed by downward pressure into
the tongue."
While many LCs with years of clinical practice have developed a working
knowledge and expertise, one concern I have is about LC students. One I
worked with was ready to endorse finger feeding based on what she had heard and
the marketing of finger feeders on company websites. She was surprised when she
did a literature search and found nothing to support finger feeding, despite
some strong opinions from experts in the field.
Finger feeding might be a fabulous tool. Talking about it on LACTNET is
interesting; training new LCs in its use is at present a hit or miss event.
Perhaps those of us with expertise, as so thoroughly described in a
previous post, would please publish a collection of case histories which would
start the ball rolling for some scientific support?
I am thinking of another situation where common knowledge and written
material were proved wrong after research. We have all seen the literature that
talks about Hoffman exercises and breast shells to treat inverted nipples in
pregnancy. When the Alexander study was done, and the results were
replicated in the MAIN Collaborative Trial, the results were amazing. The mothers that
were in the control group (neither shells nor exercises) had the most
successful breastfeeding. Neither shells nor exercises did anything to improve
nipple protactility.
warmly,
Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CCE
Maternal-Child Adjunct Faculty Union Institute and University
Film Reviews Editor, Journal of Human Lactation
Support the WHO Code and the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
