In einer eMail vom 27-10-2004 4:29:26 West-Europa (zomertijd) schreibt
[log in to unmask]:

The  reference concerning formula as fourth choice after breast, expressed
hm,  or hm from another mother, is pretty old...{WHO/UNICEF, 1980},  Position
Paper? I think...maybe someone has more info or more recent  date.

***********************************************
Does old nessecairily mean outdated?
Is there any research done that undermines this WHO recommendation? Is  there
any research that I missed that makes it reasonable to presume that AIM is  a
better choice than human milk from a safe source?

Warmly,

Gonneke van Veldhuizen, Dutch IBCLC in  Germany


             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html